Use of clandestine recordings as evidence
Claudia Csáky and Stefan Djusic recently analyzed the Supreme Court's decision of February 18, 2021 (6 Ob 16/21b) on the admissibility to use clandestine recordings as evidence in court.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Claudia Csáky and Stefan Djusic recently analyzed the Supreme Court's decision of February 18, 2021 (6 Ob 16/21b) on the admissibility to use clandestine recordings as evidence in court.
In his latest article, Dominik Possert analyzes the relationship between the information right under Art 15 GDPR and a lawyer's duty of confidentiality.
Claudia Csáky and Stefan Djusic recently analyzed the Supreme Court's decision of December 22, 2020 (4 Ob 138/20b) on trademark infringement in relation to the use of a foreign trademark to indicate the purposes of the user’s own product.
Alexander Isola, Stefan Weileder and David Seidl, insolvency experts of Graf Isola (f.k.a. Graf & Pitkowitz) have analyzed the Ministerial Draft for the Restructuring and Insolvency Directive Implementation Act (RIRL-UG).
Claudia Csáky recently analyzed the decision of the Austrian Court of Justice of December 22, 2020 (4 Ob 205/20f) on the subject of exemption to the trade mark proprietor's right to prohibit a third party from using its trademark in the context of required indications of intended purpose.
In his article Jakob Widner discusses the current draft legislation on the new Home-Office-Law.
Hubert Burda Media acquired the digital brands Netdoktor.at and Netdoktor.ch from Vienna-based netdoktor.at GmbH on February 1, 2021. The M&A team of Graf Isola acted as counsel to the buyer in all legal aspects of this transaction. The signing took place at the end of January 2021.
Prestigious "JUVE - Magazin für Wirtschaftsjuristen in Österreich" (edition January/February 2021) once again ranks the Graz office of Graf Isola (f.k.a. Graf & Pitkowitz) among the best lawfirms in Styria.
Insolvency law expert Alexander Isola provides a brief assessment of the important issues of the upcoming Restructuring Code for companies in insolvency in the current issue of Trend Premium Magazine.
Gunter Nitsche - professor emeritus and Of Counsel in our firm has received the „Award for Excellent Teaching 2019/2020“ for his particularly outstanding teaching concept at Graz University of Technology and his great personal commitment to teaching. This is another example that academics are of high priority in our firm.